Showing posts with label United States. Show all posts
Showing posts with label United States. Show all posts

Monday, December 26, 2011

Queen hails blossoming friendship with Ireland

The Queen yesterday set the seal on an historic year for Anglo-Irish relations by hailing the "long-term friendship" between Ireland and Britain, which she said could provide hope for the future.

For the first time ever in her annual Christmas message to the British people, the Queen made a clear reference to the UK's relationship with the Irish Republic, which has "blossomed" into a firm friendship.

Her four-day visit to the Republic in May -- the first by a British monarch since Irish independence -- was fondly recalled in her seven-minute address.

She has delivered her annual message every Christmas since ascending to the British throne in 1952, but mentions of Ireland were confined to the Troubles and the peace process.

Prince Philip, The Duke of Edinburgh, during a...Image via WikipediaIn her recorded message, which was filmed in Buckingham Palace's 1844 room, the queen made explicit mention of her trip to the Republic.

"This past year has also seen some memorable and historic visits, to Ireland and from America. The spirit of friendship, so evident in both these nations, can fill us all with hope.

"Relationships that years ago were once so strained have through sorrow and forgiveness blossomed into long term friendship.

"It is through this lens of history that we should view the conflicts of today and so give us hope for tomorrow."

As she reflected publicly for the first time about her historic trip, footage of her visit with former Irish president Mary McAleese to the Garden of Remembrance was played.

The Garden of Remembrance event, which took place on the first day of the visit, was one of the major highlights of the historic week and saw the queen bow her head to Ireland's patriot dead in a moment of healing between Britain and Ireland.

Tourism bosses will hope the renewed exposure during a broadcast watched by millions will entice British visitors to come here.

Previous mentions of Ireland in the Christmas message usually focused on the Troubles. In 1987, the queen spoke of the victims of the Enniskillen bombing, where 11 people were killed during a ceremony to mark Remembrance Sunday, when Britain pays tribute to its war dead.

Yesterday's message mostly focused on the bonds of family and friendship, and she used Britain's relationship with Ireland and the United States to expand on her theme.

"In this past year my family and I have been inspired by the courage and hope we have seen in so many ways in Britain, in the Commonwealth and around the world.

"We've seen that it's in hardship that we often find strength from our families; it's in adversity that new friendships are sometimes formed; and it's in a crisis that communities break down barriers and bind together to help one another."

The queen's husband, Prince Philip, is currently recuperating in hospital following treatment for a blocked coronary artery at the Norfolk royal country retreat in Sandringham.

But she said the importance of family was brought home to her and Prince Philip this year because of two royal weddings that took place -- Prince William's married Kate Midleton in a huge wedding in London last April, and Zara Phillips married England rugby player Mike Tindall.

"The importance of family has, of course, come home to Prince Philip and me personally this year with the marriages of two of our grandchildren, each in their own way a celebration of the God-given love that binds a family together."

The broadcast featured performances by the band of the Irish Guards, a regiment that was formed in 1900 to commemorate Irish soldiers who died in the Boer Wars.

The red dress worn by the queen during the broadcast was designed by royal designer Angela Kelly -- the woman behind the emerald green outfit worn by the queen during her Irish visit.



Read more: http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/republic-of-ireland/queen-hails-blossoming-friendship-with-ireland-16095439.html#ixzz1hgi8mAKh
Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, October 30, 2011

River Cities uses long-term relationships to raise $100M-plus

Ever wonder how big-time investment groups like venture capital funds get big-time investors like banks, insurers and wealthy individuals to fork over investment dough?
In short, it’s a long-term process. Really long-term.
When you’re looking to raise somewhere between $100 million and $150 million like River Cities Capital Funds is, you don’t just pick up the phone and start calling around. Or shoot off a couple of emails.
David M. Rubenstein, Co-Founder and Managing D...Image via WikipediaDan Fleming, a River Cities managing partner, said these things are done over long time periods and typically start with a personal referral.
“We typically invest time in multiple meetings over the course of months or even years to attract new investors,” he said. “There is an extreme level of trust required to make an investment in a private equity firm.”
That’s because the investors rely on the fund manager to select companies in which they’ll ultimately invest.
Doug Roberts, a partner at downtown law firm Thompson Hine who works on venture capital issues, likened venture fund-raising to a political campaign or college sports recruiting. It’s a constant process that involves years of building relationships for a payoff down the road.
Now is when River Cities is expecting that payoff. Of course, it helps that its past and present investors have gotten healthy payoffs on their investments.
Fleming must feel confident his firm can raise money somewhere in the range he mentioned. The fact he was willing to mention sizable numbers for the next fund’s target size likely means River Cities has gotten a good response from its prior investors about signing up for the next fund, Roberts said.
“That speaks well to what River Cities is seeing,” he said. “Otherwise they would say they’re playing it safe in this market.”
Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, September 10, 2011

8 Tips for Making Friends

I recently posted a list How to make friends — or at least think about it more clearly. That list sets forth the “essential friendship skills.”

But knowing the essential friendship skills isn’t the same thing as being able to make friends. And friends are very important to happiness. The more I’ve studied happiness, in fact, the more convinced I’ve become that loneliness is a very common and very serious challenge to happiness. I think it’s a subject that deserves more attention.

Friends.Image via WikipediaAncient philosophers and contemporary scientists agree: strong social ties are a key — arguably the key — to happiness. You need close, long-term relationships; you need to be able to confide in others; you need to belong; you need to get and give support. Studies show that if you have five or more friends with whom to discuss an important matter you’re far more likely to describe yourself as “very happy.”


Not only does having strong relationships make it far more likely that you take joy in life, but studies show that it also lengthens life (incredibly, even more than stopping smoking), boosts immunity, and cuts the risk of depression.

Strategies for Making Friends
But making friends can be difficult. Here are some strategies to try, if you’re eager to make friends but finding it tough:

1. Show up.

Just as Woody Allen said that “Eighty percent of success is showing up,” a big part of friendship is showing up. Whenever you have the chance to see other people, take it. Go to the party. Stop by someone’s desk. Make the effort. I’m a big believer in the power of online tools like Facebook, Twitter, and Google+ to help sustain relationships, but nothing can replace a face-to-face meeting.

Also, the mere exposure effect describes the fact that repeated exposure makes you like someone better – and makes that person like you better, too. You’re much more likely to become friends with someone if you see him or her often. I’ve seen this happen over and over in my life. I’ve become close to unlikely people, just because circumstances put us in constant contact.

2. Join a group.

Being part of a natural group, where you have common interests and are brought together automatically, is the easiest way to make friends: starting a new job, taking a class, having a baby, joining a congregation, or moving to a new neighborhood are great opportunities to join a group. If those situations aren’t an option, try to find a different group to join. Get a dog, for example. Or pursue a hobby more seriously. An added advantage to making friends through a group is that you’ll have something obvious in common with these new acquaintances, and you can strengthen your friendships to several people at once — very helpful if you don’t have a lot of free time. Which is important, because for many people, lack of time is a real obstacle to making and sustaining friendships.

3. Form a group.

If you can’t find an existing group to join, start a group based around something that interests you. My children’s literature reading groups – (yes, now I’ve helped start three of these groups) are among the top joys of my life. Studies show that each common interest between people boosts the chances of a lasting relationship, and also brings about a 2% increase in life satisfaction, but I’m confident that my kidlit groups have given me a lift in life satisfaction much higher than two percent. Movies, wine, cheese, pets, marathon-training, a language, a worthy cause…I know people in all these sorts of groups. You can start a Happiness Project group! (If you want the starter kit, to help launching a group, email me at gretchenrubin1 at gretchenrubin dot com.)

4. Say nice things about other people.

It’s a kind way to behave; also, studies show that because of the psychological phenomenon of spontaneous trait transference, people unintentionally transfer to you the traits you ascribe to other people. So if you tell Jean that Pat is arrogant, unconsciously Jean associates that quality with you. On the other hand, if you say that Pat is hilarious, you’ll be linked to that quality.

5. Set a target.

This strategy sounds very calculating, but it has really worked for me. When I enter a situation where I meet a new set of people, I set myself the goal of making three new friends. This seems artificial, but somehow, this shift makes me behave differently, it makes me more open to people, it prompts me to make the effort to say more than a perfunctory hello.

6. Make an effort to smile.

Big surprise, studies show that the amount of time you smile during a conversation has a direct effect on how friendly you’re perceived to be. In fact, people who can’t smile due to facial paralysis have trouble with relationships. I’ve been working hard on this myself lately; I’ve become more solemn over the years, or at least more distracted and tightly wound.

7. Make friends with friends-of-friends.

Triadic closure” is the term for the fact that people tend to befriend the friends of their friends. So friends-of-friends is an excellent place to start if you’re trying to expand your circle.

8. Be aware of cultural differences.

On last week’s post, a commenter noted that now that she lived in the United States, she missed the kind of easy, drop-by-your-house friendships that she’d had in Australia. She just didn’t seem able to make those close friends. But I suspect that friendship intensity isn’t the problem, just cultural practice. At least in Kansas City and New York City, the places I know best, even a very close friend wouldn’t be likely to drop by your house unannounced — no matter how those crazy kids behaved on the TV show Friends. So try to be aware of how friendship signals may be different in different places.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, July 15, 2011

Infidelity Keeps Us Together

Congratulations to Dan Savage and his mantra “Good, Giving and Game.” And thanks to Mark Oppenheimer for bringing it beyond the alternative weeklies to a wider audience of mainstream, heterosexual couples (“Married, With Infidelities”). Honest communication with your partner surely is something to strive for in a long-term relationship, although it may be difficult at first for some women to define what they want, let alone articulate it.

DEB LEVINE,
Oakland, Calif.

Bravo to Dan Savage for his forthright thesis exposing the meshugas that is monogamy. Now if he can only convince my wife.

DAVID CHARAK,
Boca Raton, Fla.

I was struck by how Dan Savage’s approach to fidelity approximates the thinking of some who work with alcoholics and who believe that for some alcoholics, moderate drinking is the lesser of two evils. “Zero tolerance” is an absurd concept that does not and cannot work in any alcohol or drug program. How many members would A.A. have if participants were kicked out after “straying”? So why apply this unrealistic standard to marriage? For all of us, it seems that the approach to monogamy should be “one day at a time.”

MICHAEL G. BRAUTIGAM,
Brooklyn

I found it somewhat ludicrous that a gay therapist is dispensing advice on how to make heterosexual marriages succeed by allowing infidelities. The argument for “open marriage” was vigorously championed most recently in the 1960s and ’70s. The result was an enormous upturn in the divorce rate. My more than 54 years as a rabbi have taught me that the commandment “you shall not commit adultery” is still terribly relevant, and our religious traditions wisely maintain that marriage is sacred, the bonds between husband and wife are inviolate and that nothing shatters marital trust more than infidelity.

RABBI GILBERT S. ROSENTHAL
Director, The National Council of Synagogues,
Needham, Mass.

I appreciated Mark Oppenheimer’s views on marriage. One point I think he should have addressed is that people like Anthony Weiner and Arnold Schwarzenegger don’t have the luxury of working his valid points about infidelity into their marriages because they don’t enjoy the privacy that the rest of us do.

CHRISTINA SCHLANK
Manhattan Beach, Calif.

How are the Vitter and Clinton marriages “failed monogamous relationships”? Both the Vitters and the Clintons are still together, so either the couples in question had an agreement about having a nonmonogamous marriage, or they were able to get beyond the fact that their partners strayed. In the case of Schwarzenegger, I would bet good money that Maria knew about Arnold’s cheating heart before they got hitched. What spurred the divorce was the fact that he never told her about a child conceived with a domestic employee — right under her nose, in her own house. It was humiliation, in that circumstance, and outsize betrayal, not just the sex, that ended that marriage. Whoever is on the cover of Us Weekly is having his or her affair blared to the universe. I would argue that’s a lot more destabilizing than just sex.

JESSICA GROSE,
1:50 p.m., June 30, Slate.com

The most telling quote comes near the end: “The greater good is the home created for children,” Dan Savage says. “If there are children present, they’ll get past it. The cultural expectation should be if there’s infidelity, the marriage is more important than fidelity.” Having children shouldn’t give anyone the right to cheat just because staying together for the children is more important. Savage stresses repeatedly that the time to talk about nonmonogamy is before either partner in a relationship has a fling.

But whenever I find out that a friend or acquaintance with children is divorcing, I can’t help imagining myself in their situation and picturing what it would be like to see my kids only half the time, to have to split up Christmases and birthdays, to spend time worrying about pickups and drop-offs that should be spent on lazy Sunday mornings with pancakes and cartoons. Even if you’re the victim in the situation, you pay a pretty high price when you end a marriage.

RACHEL LARIMORE,
5:28 p.m., June 30, Slate.com

I am married and aware that my husband has posted on “menseeking women” on Craigslist from time to time. The pain and humiliation is indescribable. He gets to fulfill his fantasies and feed his ego, but there is not a day I don’t think about divorcing him for his selfishness. It’s complex to leave someone you love for nonmonogamy, but in the end this has to be at the heart of a marriage or the bond is broken. Don’t marry if you don’t intend to be monogamous.

MEG,
Greenwich,
Conn., 10:34 a.m., June 30, nytimes.com

As Dan Savage points out, the “age-old understanding” was that men could have their flings on the side, as well as frequent prostitutes, while women were virgins at marriage and monogamous afterward. Now, as far as I can see, the understanding is that both sexes will sleep around quite a bit or have a series of “relationships” then, once married, remain completely monogamous.

FLORAMAC,
Maine, 9:59 a.m., June 30, nytimes.com

In this country, we worship marriage and demonize infidelity. How many times did a friend of a “victim” who was cheated on tell that victim to leave? But not many friends will actually try to support the victim and try to help them analyze whether the relationship is worth holding onto. Most married couples that I know have had some sort of an extramarital affair. Unfortunately, some of them divorced because of their affairs, and many regret that choice. The essence of their regret is that they miss their friend/partner and the stability that went along with their marriage and children. So let’s stop judging and crucifying private sex lives and instead lend a hand to those who just need to talk and to sort out their true emotions.

MOMOFTWO,
New York, 10:10 a.m., June 30, nytimes.com

Nowhere in this article does it talk about the person the married person is cheating with. The “other woman” and the “other man” are frequent casualties of married people using them as a tonic to what ails their marriage. Often, a married person meets another person who expands their world, offers them love and a fresh start, but because of an oath they took years before, often foolishly, they are obliged to stick out their marriage, bored and unfulfilled.

SINGLEWOMAN,
New York, 11:31 a.m., June 30, nytimes.com
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, July 5, 2011

Couples report gender differences in relationship, sexual satisfaction over time

Cuddling and caressing are important ingredients for long-term relationship satisfaction, according to an international study that looks at relationship and sexual satisfaction throughout committed relationships, but contrary to stereotypes, tenderness was more important to the men than to the women.

Also contrary to expectations of the researchers, men were more likely to report being happy in their relationship, while women were more likely to report being satisfied with their sexual relationship. The couples, more than 1,000 from the United States, Brazil, Germany, Japan and Spain, where together an average 25 years.

The study from the Kinsey Institute at Indiana University, published in the Archives of Sexual Behavior, is the first to examine sexual and relationship parameters of middle-aged or older couples in committed, long-term relationships. Research efforts to understand the place of sexuality in human lives rarely involves intact couples in ongoing relationships.

"You hear repeated research and commentary about divorce; but it's important to note that though divorce rates are high in the U.S., couples tend to stay married -- more than 50 percent of U.S. couples remain in their first marriage, and that number goes up to 90 percent in Spain," said Julia Heiman, director of The Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender and Reproduction and lead author of the article. "We know from other research that being in a long-term relationship has some value to health. Perhaps we can learn more about what makes relationships both sustainable and happy."

Participants in the study were 40- to 70-year-old men and their female partners, either married or living together for a minimum of one year. The study included around 200 couples from each country. The men and women answered gender-specific questionnaires and were assured that their responses would not be shared with their partner.

"This study on heterosexual couples provides a basis for future research on sex and gender, such as how same-sex couples may or may not show similarities and differences in relationship and sexual satisfaction," Heiman said.

RELATIONSHIP SATISFACTION

For men, relationship happiness was more likely if the man reported being in good health and if it was important to him that his partner experienced orgasm. Surprisingly, frequent kissing or cuddling also predicted happiness in the relationship for men, but not for women. Both men and women reported more happiness the longer they had been together, and if they themselves scored higher on several sexual functioning questionnaires.

Across all five nationalities, for both men and women, the Japanese were significantly happier with their relationships than Americans, and Brazilians and Spanish reported less relationship happiness than Americans.

SEXUAL SATISFACTION

Men and women both were likely to report sexual satisfaction if they also reported frequent kissing and cuddling, sexual caressing by the partner, higher sexual functioning, and if they had sex more frequently. On the other hand, for men, having had more sex partners in their lifetime was a predictor of less sexual satisfaction.

Men did report more relationship happiness in later years, whereas for women, their sexual satisfaction increased over time. Women who had been with their partner for less than 15 years were less likely to report sexual satisfaction, but after 15 years, the percentage went up significantly.

"Possibly, women become more satisfied over time because their expectations change, or life changes with the children grown," Heiman said. "On the other hand, those who weren't so happy sexually might not be married so long."

Compared with the U.S. men, Japanese men reported significantly (2.61 times) more sexual satisfaction in their relationships. For women, Japanese and Brazilian women were more likely to report being satisfied sexually than Americans.

"We recognize that relationship satisfaction and sexual satisfaction may not be the same thing for all couples, and in all cultures," Heiman said. "Our next step is to understand how one person's health, physical affection and sexual experiences relate to the relationship happiness or sexual satisfaction of his or her partner. So, we hope for more couple-centered than individual-centered understanding on relationship functioning and satisfaction."

###
Co-authors of the study are J. Scott Long and Shawna N. Smith, Indiana University; William A. Fisher, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada; and Michael S. Sand and Raymond C. Rosen, New England Research Institutes, Mass.

The study is available at http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/publications/PDF/Heiman couples midlife and older 5 countries.pdf.

The study was supported by an independent investigator-initiated grant from Bayer-Schering. The Kinsey Institute receives support from the Office of the Vice Provost for Research at IU Bloomington (OVPR). OVPR is dedicated to supporting ongoing faculty research and creative activity and developing new multidisciplinary initiatives to enhance opportunities for federal, state, and private research funding.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, July 2, 2011

Nurturing skills is critical to Mena's success story

It is no secret that education builds long-term relationships within and between communities. These relationships will play a crucial role in building the Middle East of tomorrow.
Given the increasing skills shortage in the Middle East and North Africa (Mena) and the abundance of young people in the region — half the population is under 25 years old — governments need to cooperate with the private sector in order to ensure that education is developed sufficiently to support and sustain strong economic development
This region has vast potential, and young people are more educated, more technologically literate, and more engaged with the news than ever before. We have seen much of their energy spill over into the streets of some countries, primarily out of a desire to live better lives. However, as the region continues to grow and evolve it will come up against the challenge of supplying the right people for the right jobs in its economies.
A recent report by the World Bank warned that Arab countries need to generate 100 million jobs for their youth by 2020, and high repetition and truancy rates continue to plague educational systems in many of these countries. Concurrently, many of the region's economies are expanding at a rapid rate that is creating a wealth of opportunities for employment and entrepreneurship.
Monumental efforts
Although regional governments are exerting monumental efforts to bring education to the masses, the evidence is undeniable that more needs to be done. Some 80 per cent of over 7.5 million university-level students in the region are enrolled in national universities, but these are full to the brim and lack sufficient financing. More importantly, the recently convened Global Education Forum highlighted that each university graduate needs to be supported by up to 10 people with vocational skills to be able to maintain sustainable economic growth.
These are staggering figures, and governments cannot — and should not — go it alone. It also means that we must look beyond what is fashionable for people to study, and to realise that popular assumptions about what constitutes a successful career can quickly become mismatched with economic realities on the ground.
Private sector companies which have found success in the region and want to help stimulate further success must therefore support the development of human skills and expertise locally. This must not only focus on professional disciplines, but should also offer vocational training and encourage the uptake of jobs by highlighting their importance to the economy. Several economies around the world have now ascended to global dominance thanks to the diversity of their workforces.
The region needs more scholarships and endowments for university students and fellows, and mandatory internships, apprenticeships or work-experience terms to involve students and recent graduates in hands-on industry experience that builds up their work ethic. We also need more business-education partnerships that begin in schools and continue all the way through people's careers, an approach that has been successful for Rolls-Royce, which runs a programme that enjoys a 98 per cent retention rate; with 90 per cent of apprentices going on to achieve higher qualifications, half to degree level. There are also other success stories in countries like France, with its Stage en France apprenticeship system.
Apprenticeship system
In fact, nearly all of the countries in the Middle East and North Africa have had centuries of experience in the apprenticeship system. Returning to this tradition could help alleviate skills shortages significantly, something which is already taking place in countries like Turkey, India and Pakistan.
Australian Apprenticeships involve 400,000 people in over 500 occupations, some of them as young as 14 years. In Germany it is nearly impossible to find employment without having completed an apprenticeship, and there are longstanding systems in place in countries like Austria, and even the UK which reinstated apprenticeship programmes in the 1990s following the abolishment of compulsory apprenticeships during the Industrial Revolution.
Engineering is a good example of where this approach would add value, as finding and training the engineers of the future needs to start early. A practical and interactive curriculum is key to generating enthusiasm amongst students who should have some understanding of an industry by the time they have to decide what they want to do for a career. We must reach back further into the education system by introducing initiatives that excite students about technical vocations earlier in their academic careers.
It is reassuring to see more private sector firms in the region taking on a greater responsibility towards the local community. Moreover, it could help ensure the population enjoys a more diverse range of skills that are relevant in a fast-growing region which needs local people for the industries that will power future growth.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, June 24, 2011

Dogs improve office productivity

Today is national "Take Your Dog to Work Day." According to a study by the American Pet Products Manufacturers Association, about 17 percent of workplaces nationwide participate in this annual event.

Studies abound that illustrate how dogs can help their owners create close, long-term relationships with other people. But researcher Christopher Honts and his colleagues at Central Michigan University in Mount Pleasant, Michigan decided to explore if this also held true in the workplace. They wondered if just the presence of a canine in the office might make people collaborate more effectively.

To test their theory, they conducted two experiments. In the first, they brought together 12 groups of four individuals and told each group to come up with a 15-second advertisement for a made-up product. Everyone was asked to contribute ideas, but ultimately the group had to choose what they believed to be the best one.

Some of the groups had a dog underfoot during the brainstorming and decision-making sessions, while the others were canine-less. After completing their assignment, the volunteers were asked to complete a questionnaire about what it was like to work with the other members of the team. Honts discovered that those who'd had a dog in the room gave their teammates higher marks for "trust," "team cohesion" and "intimacy" than those who had not.

The second experiment explored how the presence of an animal altered players' behavior in a game called the "prisoner's dilemma." All four members of 13 different groups were "charged" with a crime. Each person had to choose (without talking with the others) either to snitch on their teammates or to stand by them. The researchers found that having a dog around made volunteers 30 percent less likely to snitch than those who played without one.

If you are an employer wishing to implement a dogs-at-work program, check out "Dogs at Work: A Practical Guide to Creating Dog-Friendly Workplaces" (Humane Society Press, $21.95). Authors Liz Palika and Jennifer Fearing present the tangible benefits of dog-friendly policies and provide step-by-step advice for getting management on board, setting fair procedures and protocols and dealing with potential complaints and concerns.

Does your company allow dogs in the office?



Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/pets/detail?entry_id=86894#ixzz1QE0iEFaE
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, June 23, 2011

CRUSE RETURNS WITH "THE COMPLETE WENDEL"

Howard Cruse is considered by many to be one of the great modern American cartoonists, though he's drawn few comics in the past two decades. A noted underground creator before becoming the founding editor of the anthology "Gay Comix" in 1980, Cruse has a reputation for tackling head-on a topic that had been largely taboo. Throughout most of the 1980's, he wrote and illustrated a comic strip for "The Advocate." "Wendel" began as a light-hearted sex comedy, but quickly became something more as the titular character started a long term relationship and the strip depicted the gay community in a way that had rarely been seen before.

After he ended the strip, Cruse created the graphic novel "Stuck Rubber Baby," released in 1995 through DC Comics and re-released in a new hardcover edition last year from by Vertigo. Compared favorably to Art Spiegelman's "Maus" at the time of its release, "Stuck Rubber Baby" told the fictional account of a young white man coming of age in the Civil Right era, though much of it was informed by Cruse's own experiences growing up.

The Universe imprint of Rizzoli has just released "The Complete Wendel," collecting Cruse's strip from "The Advocate" with additional material and a new strip detailing where the characters are now. CBR News spoke with Cruse about his work and career and whether we can look forward to more from him in the future.
Enhanced by Zemanta

With Friends Like "US"

Ah well, see ya, Afghanistan ! Let's change our Facebook status to, uh "It's complicted." Like just about all of the United States' long-term relationships of late.

Okay, so maybe it's not the worst thing in the world that the United States and, say, Saudi Arabia aren't literally walking hand in hand (as George W. Bush and Crown Prince Abdullah did in this, ahem, awkward moment in 2005). But, as the Los Angeles Times points out, the alliance is at a more strained point than it has been in many years. The Saudis are, for example, counseling Jordan to maintain its traditional autocratic monarchical hold on power -- even as Washington has been trying to nudge its smaller ally to head in a pro-democratic direction:

Riyadh, which believes the U.S. is turning its back on loyal allies, is trying to step out of America's shadow. It is embracing a foreign policy that often diverges from Washington's — and sometimes seeks to undermine it.
On the key political issues "the Obama administration doesn't really listen to the Saudi views," said Abdullah Askar, who is vice chairman of the foreign affairs committee of the king's Consultative Council, or Majlis Shura, in Riyadh.
This shift doesn't mean the end of the 70-year-old U.S.-Saudi alliance, which is built on a simple foundation: Saudi oil for U.S. military protection. But it means a further loss of influence for Washington in the Middle East at a time when other crucial relations — with Egypt and Turkey, for example — are facing new strains.

Ah, further "loss of influence for Washington"! Where have we heard that one before? Arguably, trying to expand democracy in the Middle East is a good thing, but then we're faced with an Obama administration that doesn't seem to know which way to go (call for Mubarak's ouster; don't call for Assad's in Syria; look the other way when Saudi Arabia sends in troops to crush protestors in Bahrain). The only consistency is lack of consistency.

And then, add that to how the U.S. has treated other traditional allies -- from the sublime snubs to the 'border'-line tragic .

No wonder so many of America's closest partners might be thinking to themselves -- with friends like "US," who needs enemies?


Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/blogs/capitol/with_friends_like_us_T6XXyR2KTn8qaG8BoZHfwO#ixzz1Q9KRiXh5
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

Beware: frisky business

Relationships at work should be approached with caution, but if it is too late for that advice, Donata Huggins finds out what you should do
Donata Huggins
A TUC survey showed that a quarter of all long-term relationships in the UK started at work. Hardly surprising, given most of our time is spent there. But this happens against a backdrop of employers’ growing restrictions on office romances. While it’s understandable that employers are fearful of the consequences and the impact on their business, employees are still entitled to a private life and there is a line to be drawn between the two interests. An employer can’t sack you for simply having a relationship with a colleague, but they can get you on other things. And since navigating that path is far from easy, we have put together this guide to help you steer clear of the pitfalls.

LABEL IT
It’s that dreaded label thing. Feared by men and women across the globe. You have to define the relationship you have with your colleague if you’re going to protect yourself from any potential negative consequences. Adrian Crawford, an employment law specialist and partner at law firm Kingsley Napley, says: “If it was just a one night stand after the office party then you don’t need to panic. It all depends on whether or not you intend to keep seeing them.”

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
If the relationship has the potential to be more serious, then you need to consider at what point you need to tell your superiors. Crawford says this is far more important if there’s a conflict of interest: “If a Chinese wall is broken. For example, one person is front office and the other back office staff, then informing your line manager is very important. In theory it’s a sackable offence.” For the majority, however, discretion in the early stages might be the wisest move. Bethany Whittle met her fiance at work: “I would definitely recommend keeping the relationship on the down-low. The management will be nervous that the relationship will turn sour and it’ll create a bad atmosphere.”

KNOW YOUR RIGHTS
In big City firms your rights and any restriction placed on you will usually be spelt out in your contract or in the staff handbook. Be sure to check these, because your employer will hold you to it. Crawford says these conditions are binding and while you can’t get fired without being formally disciplined first, you don’t need to be formally disciplined many times before you’re out.

RULE OUT THE NAUGHTINESS
Naughtiness in the stock cupboard will count as gross misconduct that could have you packing up your things almost instantly. But it’s best advised to refrain from any affection, even doe-eyes and sweet nothings, because anything that makes your colleagues feel uncomfortable could have you called into the boss’s office to be cautioned.

YOUR EMPLOYER’S REACTION
The complexity of employment law gives you a degree of protection. The nuances of policy can be interpreted in multiple ways, so if you feel you’re being treated unfairly, an employment laywer or your union representative will be able to help. Employers choosing to move one half of the couple into another role or department often causes problems. The trick to resolving this situation is to work out where you stand legally. If you have been employed to conduct a particular role for a company rather than by the company at large, you may have a case against your employer.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

Physician Integration Economics: How Market Share is Captured and Retained

In the late 1990’s the term “integration,” largely associated with hospital ownership of primary care practices, fell on hard times, being viewed as a failed strategy by many. Hospital-owned medical practices were losing big money. Management teams and consultants alike removed words like "integrated delivery system," "group practice without walls," and "MSO" from our vocabularies and we headed off to find the next "silver bullet" to save the day! Some groups of hospital-owned practices were abandoned. Some hospital-owned practices were returned to the employed physicians (it was rumored in some instances for substantially less than the hospital's initial investment). Other hospitals capital-starved their physician networks, losing the best performing employed physicians in the process. Still others dramatically cut their operating losses by terminating physician employment contracts and closing locations.

Was physician employment a failed hospital strategy? Of course not! It was failed implementation. Hospitals that remained in the business and focused on learning the rules for success in owning and operating medical practices soon began stealing market share from their less astute competitors. By late 2002, consultants were again receiving telephone calls from hospitals and health systems in competitive markets indicating that since divesting of or "pruning" their networks of employed primary care physicians they had lost market share. About the same time, other hospitals and health systems began employing specialists, particularly invasive specialists, to develop or protect service lines. Today, it is fair to say that physician employment by hospitals has reached "feeding frenzy" proportions in several competitive markets around the country. The fact that many new physicians are seeking an employment option as they leave their training programs has fueled this latest round of employment activity. Moreover, as regulatory challenges to traditional equity joint ventures between hospitals and physicians increase, employment often provides an attractive alternative with less regulatory complexity.

The strategic power of the physician employment model for hospitals is significant. Those hospital leaders who fail to pay attention to the employment of physicians in their primary and secondary markets find that they are losing market share to competitors. Increasingly, those hospitals that employ large numbers of primary care physicians are contractually obligating those physicians to 'refer domestic" (with a few obvious exceptions and consistent with regulatory requirements, such as availability of services and patient choice). Others are taking a less draconian approach and educating their employed physicians about the fact that capital is generated in the hospital to support the integrated model, including those primary care practices. Their employed physicians understand that every dollar flowing to a competing hospital, either directly or indirectly is lost forever. These approaches are working, shifting market share away from even their most venerable hospital competitors. These significant strategic consequences involve what we call "Physician Integration Economics."

Physician Integration Economics
Physician Integration Economics defines how market share is captured and retained in primary care practices, is referred to specialists, who refer to facilities. It is this flow of market share that allows both revenue and capital to be generated to feed the entire community healthcare system. Smart specialty physicians and wise hospital executives understand that market share and market potential for both specialists and hospitals is a function of establishing and maintaining a strong relationship with primary care physicians, each of whom may capture, and refer when medically appropriate, 2,000 to 5,000 lives. [1]

Figure 1 illustrates the Physician Integration Economics process. Market share is captured and retained in primary care practices, where long term relationships are built and revenue is generated for those practices. That market share is referred to both invasive and non-invasive specialists when patients require specialty services, and revenue is generated for those practices. A percentage of patients will require hospitalization and may be referred directly by primary care physicians or indirectly through specialists, where hospital revenue is generated, some of which becomes capital for future spending. Private medical practices generally do not retain earnings for capital spending. Instead, they borrow their capital. Only hospitals amass large amounts of capital through current earnings, by issuing bonds or through the public market.



The financial value of physician utilization of hospital services has been the subject of debate for years. A recent survey conducted by Merritt, Hawkins & Associates asked hospital CFOs to provide the average inpatient and outpatient net revenue by several specialties through their direct referrals. The following table includes values provided for direct primary care referrals only. No indirect referrals to specialists were included.



The value of specialty physician net revenue ranged from a high of $2,662,600 for invasive cardiologists to a low of $557,916 for neurologists. The average for all specialty physicians (including OB/GYN) was $1,509,910 in 2007. [2]

While hospitals cannot legally pay physicians for referrals, the value of physician referrals and utilization of the hospital is clear. What is also clear is that value is decreasing since the last Merritt, Hawkins & Associates survey in 2004, when the average specialty net revenue was $1,885,773. [3] This phenomenon may be a function of changes in technology, changing reimbursement, competing physician-owned diagnostic and ambulatory surgery facilities, or other factors. Regardless, the trend further illustrates the importance of understanding and managing where market share is captured/retained and how it migrates through the system generating both revenue and capital.

Hospital administrator or market manager ?
Figure 1 also introduces the role of "market manager." A market manager has two key responsibilities in today's competitive environments. First, he or she must make certain that physicians want to use the hospital that the referral process proceeds unimpeded to ensure that market share can flow to the capital generating engine — the hospital. Second, the market manager must reinvest capital in the entire physician/hospital integrated system to ensure its viability and sustainability over the long term. The most likely market manager is the hospital chief executive because he or she has (at least potentially) the greatest influence on strengthening the physician integration model, on potential referral patterns, and on capital expenditures.

Successful market managers do not view themselves as hospital administrators. In fact, they delegate most hospital operations to competent lieutenants. Market managers develop and manage relationships to achieve the integrated system's strategic objectives. They are engaged in ensuring the success of affiliated primary care physicians and specialty physicians, as well as the hospital's service lines. Even if the hospital owns primary care and specialty practices, the market manager is personally involved in managing relationships with these critical "internal" customers as well as private practice physicians. Market managers are held accountable by boards or system leaders for their activities outside the hospital walls, as well as for hospital performance. The selection of Market Managers is driven by these expanded responsibilities. The measurement of their performance and the associated rewards are based on that same broad strategic scope.

Relationship management
Market managers realize that they cannot leave physician referral relationships to chance. They, and the relationship management teams they create, are critically aware of the two fundamental relationship management tenets: [4]

"Referrals follow relationships"
and,
"All relationships atrophy over time"

They must ensure that their hospital is the "Hospital of Choice" for patients and physicians alike and that their affiliated specialists are the "Specialists of Choice." [5] Further, they must affiliate in legally permissible ways with primary care physicians in the right geographic locations to garner the target patient population they seek. Then they must proactively manage relationships all along the referral chain to ensure that barriers are reduced or eliminated. Such relationship management consists of the following steps: [6]

Understand the medical practice context: Market managers must develop a clear understanding of the challenges of medical practice and how well their affiliated and owned medical practices are performing. Most physicians certainly understand, but may not be overly interested in the hospital's mission. If they are in private practice, they are worried about meeting the next payroll. If they are employed by the hospital, they are worried about the quality of their practice and home life. They are going to be concerned about how the hospital can help them be more successful through improved scheduling of ancillary tests, operating rooms, etc. A smart market manager will focus on these issues first.

Customer contact: Market managers understand that they can and should associate with their specialists who attend the hospital. They spend time each day in the medical staff lounge, which is a safe haven for those specialists who still use the hospital workshop. One market manager we know developed a beautiful and comfortable facility for attending physicians. The lounge design included the office of the chief medical officer who is readily accessible with no meetings during peak medical staff lounge hours. The market manager personally visits the lounge often, a critically simple, but frequently ignored tactic. Too many hospital administrators don't take the time to be present because they have too many early morning hospital meetings.

Market managers realize that most of their affiliated primary care physicians never visit the hospital. This challenge is addressed by the hospital CEO and other competent team members visiting primary care physicians on their turf. They have specific physician targets and go with a specific agenda that is heavily biased toward understanding the physicians; world and the challenges they face in providing quality care in today’s environment. Some Market Managers use one or more sales professionals or liaisons to help manage the process and to leverage the market manager, but wise CEOs are personally involved in key visits every week.

Listen for oppportunity: Market managers and their liaisons ask key questions about the practice specialty, about access to specialists, and about the hospital's performance. Some of the answers may be difficult to hear, but need to be understood, whether they are based in reality or not! Perception is reality and must be heard and acknowledged if it is to be changed.

Follow up: A "contact report" is written after each visit, documenting the highlights for discussion among the Market Manager and his/her relationship management team. Performance issues and other action items are identified on an action plan managed by the Market Manager. Hospital issues are addressed by hospital operating experts. Specialty physician issues are addressed by the market manager and the service line leaders.

Feedback: Within thirty days of the visit, a thank you note and specific feedback are sent to the primary care physicians. A "no" answer is preferably delivered by the market manager face-to-face, or at least in a personal telephone call.

The potential results
Relationship management under the direction of a dedicated market manager can yield huge potential returns on invested time and money. The principles that support paying attention to the issues faced by our affiliated physicians, be they employees or not, date back to the Hawthorne studies conducted by Elton Mayo in the 1920s and 1930s. [7] A few contemporary examples validate the market manager concept.

We earlier referenced the hospital CEO/market manager who paid special attention to the medical staff lounge. When this CEO arrived at her newly assigned hospital (part of a large health system) in the South, the facility was having trouble meeting payroll. The hospital was facing aggressive competitors, a depressed medical staff and limited capital. Fortunately, the medical staff included a number of dedicated primary care physicians who held more than adequate market share to support the hospital and its affiliated specialists. Among several performance improvement initiatives, the new CEO conducted a portfolio analysis to determine which service lines should receive her initial focus. She used an employment model to selectively "partner" with specialists supporting those service lines. With the help of those specialty leaders, service lines were strengthened to better meet the needs of referring physicians and their patients. She also began to remodel the medical staff lounge, even including plans for the employment of a concierge to assist her visiting physician customers (some of whom were now employed). Many individuals were skeptical of the potential impact. The results, however, convinced even those who were most skeptical. Within months, hospital performance had improved substantially and over the next few years bottom line profits rose 485 percent. These results placed her hospital among the top capital generators in the health system.

A second hospital CEO/market manager took over a troubled hospital in a medium-sized community. He realized that the hospital would need a lot of his personal attention, particularly early on in the turnaround. The sole community provider had larger competitors 45 minutes to the east and to the west. Outmigration to the larger communities for medical services was common. Among the strategies employed by this market manager was the recruitment of key physician specialists to bolster the services available in the hospital. A second critical strategy included hiring a consultant to help establish a physician relationship management process. Since the CEO was not always available, a skilled sales executive was hired and trained to help this Market Manager connect with some 200 potential referring physicians located around the region in more than 100 practices. Nine "sales routes" were established ensuring that all physicians were visited in their offices at least quarterly. Certain targeted physicians, identified by the hospital CEO were visited every four to six weeks. Despite the time it took to recruit new specialty physicians to the area, the relationship management program had had a significant effect. Even during the first year, inpatient admissions rose 3 percent, adding 308 admissions over the prior fiscal year, to contribute to fixed costs. Outpatient admissions rose 5 percent adding 1,396 cases to the total. Much of this increase occurred before new services were added, by simply alerting referring physicians to currently available services and asking for their business. During the second year, inpatient admissions increased by 762, or another 7 percent. Outpatient admissions grew 12 percent or 3,324 more cases than the first year.

Third, a health system built a new hospital in a highly competitive growing area of the marketplace. Competitors were already established, as were specialty and hospital referral patterns. The new hospital was part of a local system that owned several primary care practices, but only a few were in the new hospital's primary service area. The newly assigned hospital CEO recognized her role as a market manager. She also hired a full-time liaison with experience in medical practice management, physician recruitment and hospital services. The CEO and liaison worked as a team to develop a medical staff and to attract referrals from existing physicians by informing physicians about service availability and service quality at the new facility. They spent time inviting physicians to the new facility and conducting numerous tours. They also spent time in the offices of potential physician "partners" to discuss the services they needed and to improve hospital performance. The first year of operations, inpatient admissions were slightly over 4,800. During the second year of operations, inpatient admissions increased 50 percent, followed by another 10 percent increase the third fiscal year. Outpatient admissions during the first year were slightly over 2,400. Outpatient cases more than doubled during the second year and increased another 4 percent the third year, again, despite heavy competition from established competitors and despite previously established referral patterns.

Summary
Simply placing physician practices and hospitals in the same legal structure and on the same organization chart does not result in integration. Successful integration requires executives and physicians who understand and develop strategies based on physician integration economics. Successful integration requires a market manager, usually the hospital CEO, who understands the importance of developing and maintaining referral chains by investing capital in improving primary care access, responsive specialty services and high quality hospital service lines. Successful integration requires the full time and attention of the market manager and his or her team, not leaving any relationships to chance. Successful integration has a demonstrable return on investment and provides for strategic sustainability over the long term.

Footnotes:
[1] Halley M. D. 2007. The Primary Care—Market Share Connection: How Hospitals Achieve Competitive Advantage. Chicago: Health Administration Press, xi.
[2] Merritt, Hawkins & Associates. 2008. “2007 Physician Inpatient/Outpatient Revenue Survey. Available http://www.merritthawkins.com/pdf/2007_Physician_Inpatient_Outpatient_Revenue_Survey.pdf.
[3] Ibid., 8.
[4] Halley, M.D. 2007. The Primary Care—Market Share Connection: How Hospitals Achieve Competitive Advantage. Chicago: Health Administration Press, 120-121.
[5] Halley, M.D. 2006. Specialist of Choice Practice Evaluation. The Halley Consulting Group, LLC. Available http://www.halleyconsulting.com.
[6] Halley, M.D. 2007. The Primary Care—Market Share Connection: How Hospitals Achieve Competitive Advantage. Chicago: Health Administration Press, 122-124.
[7]Hampton, D. 1977. Contemporary Management. New York:NY. McGraw-Hill. p. 15-19.


Marc D. Halley, MBA, is President and CEO of The Halley Consulting Group, LLC., Westerville, Ohio.

Peg Holtman is President and CEO of Healthcare Marketing Systems, Inc., New Albany, Indiana.

Anthony D. Shaffer, Esquire is a Senior Attorney with Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, LLP., Columbus, Ohio.
Enhanced by Zemanta